
M
OTION TO WITHDRAW – PAGE 2 OF 3
limited to that which is identified in the agreement, that Counsel is not required to represent
the Debtor in any bankruptcy proceeding following or resulting from the involuntary case,
and that in the absence of a separate agreement to do so, Counsel is not required to undertake
any representation of the debtor in bankruptcy beyond that of the involuntary. The client
agreement also states:
Legal Representation by Busch Ruotolo & Simpson, LLP of Jeffrey Baron
to defend the Client against an involuntary bankruptcy petition in the
related adversary proceeding styled In re Jeffrey Baron, now pending before
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas,
Dallas Division, Case No. 12-37921-SGJ, but not representation of the
Debtor in the event an order for relief is entered under 11 U.S.C. Section
362.
3. On June 26, 2013, this Court entered its Findings and Conclusions concerning
the trial of the involuntary bankruptcy case, and entered an Order for Relief [see Docket Nos.
239 and 240], thus ending and terminating Counsel’s agreed engagement.
4. Inasmuch as the engagement between Counsel and the Alleged Debtor has
ended by its terms, and inasmuch as Counsel did not agree to represent Mr. Baron in
bankruptcy (nor did he agree for Counsel to serve in that capacity), withdrawal is probably
unnecessary. Nonetheless, in an abundance of propriety and clarity, Counsel seeks official
leave to withdraw as counsel for Mr. Baron this cause for the reasons stated.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel of record for Jeffrey Baron,
respectfully pray that on final hearing hereof, this Court enter an order granting Counsel leave to
withdraw as counsel of record in this cause, and granting such other and further relief to which
Counsel may be justly entitled.
Case 12-37921-sgj7 Doc 243 Filed 06/28/13 Entered 06/28/13 09:28:14 Page 2 of 3