![]()
RESPONSE TO [DOC#199] - Page 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
NETSPHERE, INC., § Civil Action No. 3-09CV0988-F
MANILA INDUSTRIES, INC., and §
MUNISH KRISHAN, §
Plaintiffs. §
§
v. §
§
JEFFREY BARON, and §
ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, §
Defendants. §
APPELLANTS’ JOINT RESPONSE AND MOTION TO STRIKE THE
RECEIVER'S MOTION FOR ORDER CONFIRMING PROPRIETY OF
FUND MANAGEMENT [DOC#199]
TO THE HONORABLE ROYAL FURGESON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE:
COMES NOW, Appellant, defendant Jeffrey Baron and Appellants
NovoPoint, LLC and Quantec, LLC and make this joint response and motion to
strike the Receiver's Motion For Order Confirming Propriety of Fund Management
[Doc#199].
1. The receiver’s motion does not comply with the mandatory requirements
of Local Rule 7.1(a) which require that “Before filing a motion, an attorney for the
moving party must confer with an attorney for each party affected by the requested
relief to determine whether the motion is opposed.” Further, if a conference was
not held, the certificate must explain why it was not possible to confer. LR
7.1(b)(3). No conference was held with the Appellants’ counsel and no
Case 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 245 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID 5762