States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (and thereby to the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court in this matter).
6. While bankruptcy is initially federal law, many aspects of cases are determined by
state law.
7. Without limitation, this Court has issued two Show Cause Orders implicating
Texas State criminal law.
8. Additionally, state law may control the attorney fee issues raised by Gerrit
Pronske as well as the evaluation of claims.
9. Mr. Lyon has advised Baron that Mr. Lyon is admitted only in the State of
Oklahoma and that the Oklahoma Supreme Court requires that when an attorney licensed only in
Oklahoma appears in the courts of another state (including the Federal Courts located in a state
other than Oklahoma) the Oklahoma lawyer must associate with an attorney licensed in that state
for the purpose of any non-Oklahoma state law issues.
10. Additionally, Baron asked the Court on September 22, 2010 to allow him to be
represented Mr. Thomas at the show cause hearing because Mr. Lyon had not previously
handled a show cause hearing and Mr. Thomas had. Baron had asked Mr. Lyon to assert the
objections stated in Exhibit “A” but Mr. Lyon failed to do so. Baron believes the same
objections should be asserted as to the Show Cause Order issued on September 27, 2010.
11. Mr. Thomas has been paid in full for his services through September 30, 2010 and
agrees not to assert any future non-payment in this bankruptcy.
Wherefore, Baron prays that the Court reconsider its prior rulings in light of Mr. Lyon’s
not being licensed to practice law in the State of Texas and that Martin Thomas be substituted as
his lead counsel of record in this matter.
Dated: September 28, 2010 Respectfully submitted,
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AND TO RECONSIDER EMPLOYMENT OF
GARY LYONS AS SOLE ATTORNEY FOR JEFF BARON - Page NO.: 2
Case 09-34784-sgj11 Doc 461 Filed 09/30/10 Entered 09/30/10 13:01:00 Desc
Main Document Page 2 of 3