RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED IN UNDERLYING
LITIGATION PAGE 1
Gerrit M. Pronske
State Bar No. 16351640
Vickie L. Driver
Texas Bar No. 24026886
Christina W. Stephenson
State Bar No. 24049535
PRONSKE & PATEL, P.C.
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5350
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 658-6500 – Telephone
(214) 658-6509 – Telecopier
Email: gpronske@pronskepatel.com
Email: vdriver@pronskepatel.com
Email: cstephenson@pronskepatel.com
COUNSEL FOR JEFFREY BARON
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
In re: §
§
ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, § CASE NO. 09-34784-SGJ-11
§
Debtor. § Chapter 11
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC
STAY TO PROCEED IN UNDERLYING LITIGATION
TO THE HONORABLE STACEY G. C. JERNIGAN,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:
Jeffrey Baron (“Baron”), a creditor in this case, hereby files this his Response to Motion
for Relief from Automatic Stay to Proceed in Underlying Litigation (“Response”) filed on October
12, 2009 by Manila Industries, Inc. and Netsphere, Inc. (collectively, the “Netsphere Parties”) and
in support thereof, respectfully represent as follows:
I. RESPONSE
Paragraphs 1 through 17 of this Response reply to the paragraphs of the Motion for Relief
from Automatic Stay to Proceed in Underlying Litigation ("Stay Motion") bearing the same
Case 09-34784-sgj11 Doc 136 Filed 10/27/09 Entered 10/27/09 17:45:21 Page 1 of 4
RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED IN UNDERLYING
LITIGATION PAGE 2
number.
1. Baron admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Stay Motion.
2. Baron denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of the Stay Motion. Baron
further denies that the settlement agreement referenced in Paragraph 2 is enforceable.
3. Baron denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the Stay Motion.
4. Baron denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of the Stay Motion, except
for the existence of contentious litigation. The Netsphere Parties failed to carry out the terms of
the Settlement Agreement.
5. Baron denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 of the Stay Motion.
6. Baron denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of the Stay Motion.
7. Baron admits that the Debtor filed its voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division on or about July 27, 2009.
8. Baron denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of Paragraph 8 of the
Stay Motion. Baron admits the allegation that the Netsphere Parties have filed an objection to a
motion filed by the Debtor. Baron admits that Debtor’s bankruptcy counsel filed an emergency
motion to continue the hearing. Baron denies the allegations contained within the remainder of
Paragraph 8 of the Stay Motion.
9. Baron admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Stay Motion.
10. Baron is without sufficient information to admit or deny the content of his
testimony as allegedly summarized in Paragraph 10 of the Stay Motion.
11. Baron admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Stay Motion.
12. Baron admits the allegations contained within the first sentence of Paragraph 12
of the Stay Motion. Baron is without information to admit or deny the allegations contained
Case 09-34784-sgj11 Doc 136 Filed 10/27/09 Entered 10/27/09 17:45:21 Page 2 of 4
RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED IN UNDERLYING
LITIGATION PAGE 3
within the second and third sentence of Paragraph 12 of the Stay Motion. Baron admits that
Judge Ferguson stated that he may appoint a receiver in the case, but denies the remainder of the
allegations contained within the fourth sentence of Paragraph 12 of the Stay Motion.
13. Baron admits the allegations contained within the first sentence of Paragraph 13
of the Stay Motion. Baron admits that he properly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights at the
September 11, 2009 hearing.
14. Baron admits that Daniel J. Sherman was appointed as Chapter 11 Trustee, but
denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 14 of the Stay Motion.
15. Baron is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations contained
within Paragraph 15 of the Stay Motion.
16. Baron denies the allegations contained within Paragraph 16 of the Stay Motion.
17. Baron admits the allegations contained within Paragraph 17 of the Stay Motion.
II. RELIEF REQUESTED
18. The balance of the contentions in the Stay Motion are legal contentions which
Baron need not admit or deny. To the extent the remainder of the Stay Motion contains any
factual allegations, Baron denies that there is cause to lift the stay to allow the District Court
litigation to be pursued in its entirety to conclusion.
19. Additionally, Baron submits that the automatic stay should be lifted for the
purpose of allowing Mr. Peter Vogel to be paid out of the trust account of Friedman & Feiger,
LLP as ordered by Judge Ferguson of the Federal District Court. Baron does not agree that the
stay should be lifted to allow payment to be made to Equivalent Data.
III. CONCLUSION
20. Movant has failed to sufficiently plead or prove “cause” as a basis for lifting the
Case 09-34784-sgj11 Doc 136 Filed 10/27/09 Entered 10/27/09 17:45:21 Page 3 of 4
RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED IN UNDERLYING
LITIGATION PAGE 4
stay under 362(d)(1). Moreover, the Stay Motion fails to show how the Property is not necessary
to the Debtor’s reorganization. Accordingly, it has failed to carry its burden under 362(d)(2) as
well. Therefore, Movant is not entitled to relief from the stay.
WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Baron respectfully requests this
Court deny the Stay Motion and grant Baron such other and further relief whether in law or
equity, to which Baron is entitled.
Dated: October 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted
By: /s/ Gerrit M. Pronske____
Gerrit M. Pronske
Texas Bar No. 16351640
Vickie L. Driver
Texas Bar No. 24026886
Christina W. Stephenson
Texas Bar No. 24049535
PRONSKE & PATEL, P.C.
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5350
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: 214.658.6500
Facsimile: 214.658.6509
Email: gpronske@pronskepatel.com
Email: vdriver@pronskepatel.com
Email: cstephenson@pronskepatel.com
COUNSEL FOR JEFFREY BARON
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on October 27, 2009 I caused to be served the
foregoing pleading upon all parties registered to receive electronic notice via the Court’s
electronic transmission facilities.
/s/ _Gerrit M. Pronske______
Gerrit M. Pronske
Case 09-34784-sgj11 Doc 136 Filed 10/27/09 Entered 10/27/09 17:45:21 Page 4 of 4