RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED IN UNDERLYING
LITIGATION – PAGE 3
within the second and third sentence of Paragraph 12 of the Stay Motion. Baron admits that
Judge Ferguson stated that he may appoint a receiver in the case, but denies the remainder of the
allegations contained within the fourth sentence of Paragraph 12 of the Stay Motion.
13. Baron admits the allegations contained within the first sentence of Paragraph 13
of the Stay Motion. Baron admits that he properly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights at the
September 11, 2009 hearing.
14. Baron admits that Daniel J. Sherman was appointed as Chapter 11 Trustee, but
denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 14 of the Stay Motion.
15. Baron is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations contained
within Paragraph 15 of the Stay Motion.
16. Baron denies the allegations contained within Paragraph 16 of the Stay Motion.
17. Baron admits the allegations contained within Paragraph 17 of the Stay Motion.
II. RELIEF REQUESTED
18. The balance of the contentions in the Stay Motion are legal contentions which
Baron need not admit or deny. To the extent the remainder of the Stay Motion contains any
factual allegations, Baron denies that there is cause to lift the stay to allow the District Court
litigation to be pursued in its entirety to conclusion.
19. Additionally, Baron submits that the automatic stay should be lifted for the
purpose of allowing Mr. Peter Vogel to be paid out of the trust account of Friedman & Feiger,
LLP as ordered by Judge Ferguson of the Federal District Court. Baron does not agree that the
stay should be lifted to allow payment to be made to Equivalent Data.
III. CONCLUSION
20. Movant has failed to sufficiently plead or prove “cause” as a basis for lifting the
Case 09-34784-sgj11 Doc 136 Filed 10/27/09 Entered 10/27/09 17:45:21 Page 3 of 4