Corrections Made for Partial Healing

No. 10-11202 
(and consolidated cases) 
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 10-11202
NETSPHERE, INC. Et Al, 
Plaintiffs
v.
JEFFREY BARON, 
Defendant-Appellant
v.
ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, 
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal of Ex Parte Order Appointing Receiver 
Where No Claims were Pled in the Property Seized
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Cons. w/ No. 11-10113
NETSPHERE INC., Et Al,  Plaintiffs
v.
JEFFREY BARON, Et Al, Defendants
v.
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C.,
Appellants
v.
PETER S. VOGEL, 
Appellee
From the United States District Court
Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
Civil Action No. 3-09CV0988-F
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CORRECTED 
PETITION FOR PARTIAL REHEARING
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108929     Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
1 of 28

–
4
–
TO: HONORABLE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
Appellant  Jeffrey  Baron  requests  leave  for  file  a  corrected  petition  for 
partial rehearing, which corrects inadvertent editing errors as follows:
1. Issue One should read:
A court without jurisdiction and authority to place property into 
receivership  is  without  power  to  make  any  charge  upon,  or 
disposition of, the assets.
2. A quote on page five should read from the cut-off parenthetical: 
"[this] is not a mere nicety of legal metaphysics." 
 3. A quotation mark added on page 13.
 4. The cite at footnote 32 on page 15 should read “3556, 3565” instead of  
3565.  The inadvertently deleted record cite to R. 3565 is a citation to the order 
of the District Court denying Baron's request to conduct discovery, and may be 
material to the Panel’s consideration.  
  5. The citation  "R. 3890-2" at page 13  moved  from  middle to end of 
sentence.  
These corrections may be helpful to the Panel in considering the petition.  
The editing error came to  light when printed copies were being prepared  for 
submission. 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108929     Page: 2     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
2 of 28

–
5
–
Wherefore,  Jeffrey  Baron  requests  leave  to  file  the  attached  corrected 
Petition  for  Partial  Rehearing,  and  submit  paper  copies  in  conformity  with 
same.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Gary N. Schepps
Gary N. Schepps
Texas State Bar No. 00791608
5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75240
(972) 200-0000 - Telephone
(972) 200-0535 - Facsimile
Email: legal@schepps.net
COUNSEL FOR JEFF BARON
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
This  is  to  certify  that  Counsel  requested  agreement  from  counsel  for  the 
Appellees and the Appellees have not indicated if they oppose the motion. 
CERTIFIED BY: /s/ Gary N. Schepps
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that this brief was served this day on all parties who receive 
notification through the Court’s electronic filing system.
CERTIFIED BY: /s/ Gary N. Schepps
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108929     Page: 3     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
3 of 28

No. 10-11202  
and Consolidated Cases  
 
In the 
United States Court of Appeals 
for the Fifth Circuit 
 
No. 10-11202 
NETSPHERE, INC. Et Al,  
Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON,  
Defendant-Appellant 
v. 
ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY,  
Defendant-Appellee 
 
Appeal of Ex Parte Order Appointing Receiver  
Where No Claims were Pled in the Property Seized 
 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 11-10113 
NETSPHERE INC., Et Al,  Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Et Al, Defendants 
v. 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C.,  
Appellants 
v. 
PETER S. VOGEL,  
Appellee 
 
From the United States District Court 
Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division 
Civil Action No. 3-09CV0988-F 
 
PETITION FOR PARTIAL REHEARING 
 
 
 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108930     Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
4 of 28

 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 11-10289 
NETSPHERE, INC., ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Defendant- Appellant 
v. 
 DANIEL J SHERMAN, Appellee 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 11-10290
 
NETSPHERE, INC. ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, ET AL, Defendants 
 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C., Non-Party Appellants
 
v. 
PETER S. VOGEL, Appellee 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 11-10390
 
NETSPHERE, INC. ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Defendant – Appellant 
 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C., Appellants 
v. 
ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee 
v. 
PETER S. VOGEL, Appellee 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 11-10501
 
NETSPHERE, INC. ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Defendant – Appellant 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C., Appellants 
CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL, L.L.P.,  Appellant
 
v. 
PETER S. VOGEL; DANIEL J. SHERMAN, Appellees 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108930     Page: 2     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
5 of 28

Cons. w/ No. 12-10003 
NETSPHERE, INC. ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Defendant – Appellant
 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C., Appellants 
 
GARY SCHEPPS, Appellant 
v.
 
PETER S. VOGEL, Appellee 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 12-10444 
 
In re: NOVO POINT LLC, Petitioner 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 12-10489 
NETSPHERE, INC. ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Defendant – Appellant
 
 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C., Appellants 
v.
 
PETER S. VOGEL; DANIEL J. SHERMAN , Appellees 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 
Cons. w/ No. 12-10657 
NETSPHERE, INC. ET AL, Plaintiffs 
v. 
JEFFREY BARON, Defendant – Appellant
 
 
QUANTEC L.L.C.; NOVO POINT L.L.C., Appellants 
v.
 
PETER S. VOGEL; DANIEL J. SHERMAN , Appellees 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108930     Page: 3     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
6 of 28

 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
/s/ Gary N. Schepps
 
Gary N. Schepps 
Texas State Bar No. 00791608 
5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1200 
Dallas, Texas 75240 
(972) 200-0000 - Telephone 
(972) 200-0535 - Facsimile 
Email: legal@schepps.net 
FOR JEFFREY BARON 
 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108930     Page: 4     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
7 of 28

 
 
-
ii - 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................. ii
 
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES......................................................................................... iii 
THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS PETITION............................................................. vi 
ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................... 1 
ISSUE 1: A COURT WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITY TO 
PLACE PROPERTY INTO RECEIVERSHIP IS WITHOUT POWER TO 
MAKE ANY CHARGE UPON, OR DISPOSITION OF, THE ASSETS..................................1
 
ISSUE 2: THE PANEL’S OPINION MISAPPREHENDS KEY OPERATIVE 
FACTS. ..........................................................................................................................................6
 
ISSUE 3: THE PANEL’S DECISION ERRONEOUSLY AFFIRMS 
DEPRIVING JEFF BARON OF SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY INTERESTS 
WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ERRS IN LABELING BARON AS 
A “VEXATIOUS LITIGANT” WHEN THE CHARGE WAS RAISED ONLY 
AFTER BARON WAS STRIPPED EX PARTE OF ALL HIS ASSETS, HIS 
DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE, AND BARON WAS DENIED DISCOVERY 
AND PROHIBITED FROM HIRING PAID COUNSEL TO DEFEND 
HIMSELF.....................................................................................................................................12
 
CONCLUSION & PRAYER........................................................................................ 15 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................................... 16 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108930     Page: 5     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
8 of 28

 
 
-
iii - 
 
 
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 
FEDERAL CASES 
Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman,  
208 U.S. 360, 373-374 (1908)................................................................................2 
Bass v. Hoagland,  
172 F.2d 205, 209 (5th Cir. 1949)........................................................................15 
Cochrane v. WF Potts Son & Co.,  
47 F.2d 1026, 1028-1029 (5th Cir. 1931) ..............................................................1 
Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.,  
141 F. 3d 224, 233  (5th Cir. 1998)......................................................................14 
De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States,  
325 U.S. 212, 217 (1945) .......................................................................................5 
Fall v. Eastin,  
215 U.S. 1, 11 (1909) .............................................................................................4 
Ferring BV v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.,  
437 F.3d 1181, 1203 (Fed. Cir. 2006)..................................................................14 
Goldberg v. Kelly,  
397 U.S. 254 (1970) .............................................................................................14 
Griffin v. Lee,  
621 F.3d 380, 384 (5th Cir. 2010)..........................................................................4 
In Re Consolidated Bancshares, Inc.,  
785 F.2d 1249,1253 (5th Cir. 1986).....................................................................12 
      Case: 10-11202      Document: 00512108930     Page: 6     Date Filed: 01/10/2013
9 of 28

 
 
-
iv - 
 
 
In Re DP Partners Ltd. Partnership,  
106 F. 3d 667, 671-673 (5th Cir. 1997)................................................................12 
In re Oliver,  
333 U.S. 257, 27