-1-IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASDALLAS DIVISIONNETSPHERE, INC., §MANILA INDUSTRIES, INC., and §MUNISH KRISHAN, §Plaintiffs. §§ Civil Action No. 3-09CV0988-Fv. §§JEFFREY BARON, and §ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, §Defendants. §EMERGENCY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE: MOTION TORECONSIDER STAY OF DOMAIN NAME SALES PENDING APPEALTO THE HONORABLE JUDGE ROYAL FURGESON:COMES NOW JEFF BARON, and moves this Court to grant leave to filethe following motion to reconsider stay of the sale of domain names pendingappeal as this Honorable Court advised the Fifth Circuit would be done. [Doc 631].1. This Honorable Court has ordered that any motions filed on behalf of Baronbe filed as motions for leave.2. Your Honor entered an Advisory order stating that Your Honor “would stayorders concerning the sale of domain names and orders concerning fees to be paidto the Baron attorneys pending appeal.” Baron requested such an order and thisHonorable Court granted such an order.3. However, this Honorable Court has now entered an order that the stay willnotbe allowed pending appeal because Novo Point LLC and Quantec LLCsCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 821 Filed 02/02/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID 41383USCA5 363-2-motion before the Fifth Circuit was denied. Accordingly, this Honorable Court isdenying relief this Honorable Court Advised would be ordered, and is penalizingrelief granted to Baron because of appellate motions made on behalf of Novo PointLLC and Quantec LLC.4. This Honorable Court advised the Fifth Circuit that the orders to liquidateand pay attorneys would be stayed by this Honorable Court pending appeal. Baronrequested from this Honorable Court that relief. (This Court instructed the LLCsnot to file motions with this Honorable Court, and therefore filed in the FifthCircuit.). Both Baron and the LLCs have honored the orders of this HonorableCourt. This motion respectfully prays that this Honorable Court will reconsiderthe issue and stay the asset sales pending appeal, as this Honorable Court Advisedwould be done.5. Jointly and in the alternative, emergency temporary stay is prayed for toallow for alternative purchases to be found to raise the same net revenue from1/50thof the amount of assets. If each asset is worth over a million dollars, sellinga single asset at a higher price will accomplish the purpose of paying fees, if that isthe purpose. Sherman has acknowledged on the record that individual domains canbe sold for over a million dollars.6. The domain names are unique, and if lost through sales the damage wouldbe irreparable. Sherman and Vogel have taken the position that sale of domains areCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 821 Filed 02/02/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID 41384USCA5 364-3-non-appealable. If that is correct, allowing the sales of unique names wrongfullywould be irreparable. That is because once an asset is sold, might not besubsequently restored and appeal might be made moot as Sherman and Vogelargue. See, e.g,. American Grain Ass'n v. Lee-Vac, Ltd., 630 F.2d 245, 247 (5th Cir.1980). Additionally, there is no party with sufficient assets to cover the loss shouldthe sales be found to be wrongful.WHEREFORE, Jeff Baron requests the Court to reconsider the stay of thedomain name sales pending resolution of the issues on appeal before the FifthCircuit.Respectfully submitted,/s/ Gary N. ScheppsGary N. ScheppsTexas State Bar No. 00791608Drawer 670804Dallas, Texas 75367(214) 210-5940 - Telephone(214) 347-4031 - FacsimileE-mail: legal@schepps.netCOUNSEL FOR JEFF BARONCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 821 Filed 02/02/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID 41385USCA5 365-4-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEThis is to certify that this document was served this day on all parties who receivenotification through the Court’s electronic filing system.CERTIFIED BY: /s/ Gary N. ScheppsGary N. ScheppsCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 821 Filed 02/02/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID 41386USCA5 366