-1-IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASDALLAS DIVISIONNETSPHERE, INC., §MANILA INDUSTRIES, INC., and §MUNISH KRISHAN, §Plaintiffs. §§ Civil Action No. 3-09CV0988-Fv. §§JEFFREY BARON, and §ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, §Defendants. §EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION FORLEAVE TO FILE: MOTION TO RECONSIDER STAY OF DOMAINNAME SALES PENDING APPEALTO THE HONORABLE JUDGE ROYAL FURGESON:COMES NOW JEFF BARON, and moves this Court to reconsider grantingleave to file the following motion to reconsider stay of the sale of domain namespending appeal as this Honorable Court advised the Fifth Circuit would be done.[Doc 631].1. Review of the ruling of this Honorable Court indicates that this HonorableCourt’s ruling was based in the impression that Baron attempted to seek concurrentrelief in the appellate court. If relevant to the considerations of this HonorableCourt, that impression is in error.2. Baron filed onlyfor relief before this Honorable Court, and the LLCs filedbefore the Fifth Circuit in conformity with the directives and orders of thisCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 823 Filed 02/02/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID 41389USCA5 369-2-Honorable Court. Baron was not a party to the motion before the Fifth Circuit.See Attached Exhibit A.3. This motion for reconsideration raises the foregoing to the attention of theCourt, if that matter is relevant to the Court’s decision regarding stay.4. Your Honor entered an Advisory order stating that Your Honor “would stayorders concerning the sale of domain names and orders concerning fees to be paidto the Baron attorneys pending appeal.” If relevant movant notes that: (1) Baronhas no secret off-shore bank accounts; (2) The assets are not being sold atreasonable prices; (3) The assets are not owned by Baron, they are owned by theVillage Trust, a medical research trust set up by Baron over half a decade ago;(4) Baron has neverreceived income or taken funds from the trust for his personaluse.WHEREFORE, Jeff Baron respectfully requests his Honorable Court toreconsider granting leave to file for stay of the domain name sales pendingresolution of the issues on appeal before the Fifth Circuit.Respectfully submitted,/s/ Gary N. ScheppsGary N. ScheppsTexas State Bar No. 00791608Drawer 670804Dallas, Texas 75367(214) 210-5940 - Telephone(214) 347-4031 - FacsimileE-mail: legal@schepps.netCOUNSEL FOR JEFF BARONCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 823 Filed 02/02/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID 41390USCA5 370-3-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEThis is to certify that this document was served this day on all parties who receivenotification through the Court’s electronic filing system.CERTIFIED BY: /s/ Gary N. ScheppsGary N. ScheppsCase 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 823 Filed 02/02/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID 41391USCA5 371-8-TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OFAPPEALS:COMES NOW Novo Point LLC, and Quantec LLC, Appellants, and movefor an emergency order to immediately and temporarily stay the order of theDistrict Court to sell immediately in private, no-auction sales what appears to be$60 Millionin assets for $0.02 cents on the Dollar. The District Court had advisedthis Honorable Court that if allowed to rule on the motions to sell the domain nameassets it would stay the sales to allow appeal. SR. v9 p97. Contrary to theDistrict Court’s advisory to this Honorable Court, it has not stayed the sales, andhas ordered they be conducted immediately.Jurisdiction of the Court of AppealsWhen property is placed into a receivership, it is taken into possession bythe court through its representative, the receiver. See Booth v. Clark, 58 U.S. 322,331 (1855). When a receivership order is appealed, the effect of the appeal is thatthe appellate court has “jurisdiction over the res the same as the trial court had”.Palmer v. Texas, 212 U.S. 118, 126 (1909). Accordingly, this Honorable Courtcurrently holds possession and jurisdiction over the assets of Novo Point LLC andQuantec, LLC. R. 3934, 4306. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1651, this Honorable Courtmay issue “all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respectivejurisdictions”. If the District Court’s order authorizing sale of receivershipassets— the domain names owned by Novo Point LLC and Quantec LLC— is notCase: 10-11202 Document: 00511742749 Page: 9 Date Filed: 01/31/2012Case 3:09-cv-00988-F Document 823 Filed 02/02/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID 41392USCA5 372